The Foolishness of God
Disclaimers
First of all - Who am I?
Short answer, Nobody.
Second - What are my Credentials?
Short answer, I have none.
Third - Why should you trust what follows?
Short answer, Why should you trust anything on the internet?
prada earmuffs instagram ranking followers instagram 100 followers carlos prada gucci online sale comprar instagram followers 6111 n.river rd.rosemont il 60018 prada scarf men owens corning slatestone gray pictures prada mens boots instagram followers 2017 carluccis menu chatgpt translate chatgpt llm prada bedazzled bag englewood ymca online clothing outlet stores buy chatgpt stock beard long goatee prada buckle belt iron girlz building materials suppliers near me yacht caps garth brooks maria christmas song chomsky chatgpt gucci group chatgpt chan gafas prada mujer new tamagotchi mnii fuzzy prada bag black diamond aspect ski yacht cap chatgpt 入口 tamagotchi online prada duffle prada pr 57xs women's prada necklace prada cologne l'homme pantone extended gamut prada mens jewelry meundies t shirt chatgpt 购买 excel chatgpt test chatgpt gucci com gucci online sale handbag outlets online factory online stores prada ballerinas captain uniform coach outlrt prada store online outlet versace prada socks mens free chatgpt alternative prada repair instagram 20k followers instant instagram followers black prada flats wig making navy blue prada lentes prada blancos block instagram followers faja de prada prada square glasses prada tasche prada homes fast instagram followers large bulletin boards prada campaign restaurants near 60018 elements design build premium instagram followers prada spring 2023 prada authentic chatgpt nyt prada watch ladies gucci things birkenstock outlet store make wig camisa prada hombre legit instagram followers prada leather sandals 700 followers instagram roll of cork gucci ttt suede prada bag prada españa outlet fashion online tamagatchis versace outlets followers instagram buy fajas de prada travel agent slogan prada pattina bag 10 instagram followers gucci moda women's prada shades how to make wigs prada computer bag aaa catalina express discount paypal instagram followers prada europe website
My purpose in making the simple declarations above is a (possibly) useless attempt to prevent the inevitable personal attacks that the following sections may provoke. In my opinion, it is a waste of time attacking me personally, if you are in disagreement with the following statements and ideas. After all, I just stated that I am nobody. Generally, it is assumed that one should attack when one is threatened and if one is threatened, it stands to reason that if one is going to attack then one should attack the threat. If you are alone in the midst of the African Savannah in the middle of the night and you hear the roar of a lion close behind you that would certainly be a threat. If you were armed with a gun (which is an obvious need if you are in the middle of the savanna in the middle of the night), would it be wiser to attack the air, which carried the lion's roar, or the lion that made the roar? Even when threatened by a hurricane or a tornado do you take shelter from the air or from the wind? In both of these examples, the air is not the threat. The threat is not the air that carries the roar. It is not the roar. The threat is the lion while the air is the messenger. The threat is not the air carried by the wind. It is not really the wind; it is the power of the storm that creates the wind that is the threat. I am not the lion. I am not the lion's roar. I am simply air, the messenger. I am not the power of the storm. I am not the wind it creates. I am simply the air it carries, the messenger.
How do you know what you know is so?
This is always the starting point of any discussion regardless of how much or (unfortunately) how little time is spent on this point during the discussion. For most people the criteria for establishing certainty about a particular statement is assumed to be universal. But a truly rational and skeptical mind should recognize the importance of both sides of a discussion agreeing to and actually using the same criteria for truth. For a true skeptic, assumptions are anathema! The problem is that due to human physical, and mental limitations at some point even for true skeptics, assumptions prove to be a "necessary evil". This does not mean however, that all assumptions are necessarily evil.